Subframe
Visual UI editor that outputs production React and Tailwind CSS deterministically, synced straight into your codebase
MCP server that feeds coding agents 800,000 real app screens so the UI they generate stops looking generic
UIZZE is a remote MCP server that gives Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot a searchable catalogue of 800,000+ real web and iOS screens, plus design contracts, implementation audits, and screenshot critique — all inside the coding agent. A free no-auth preview server exposes one tool, check_ui_slop; full catalogue access is $9/month or $99 once for lifetime. It is deliberately narrow: it improves UI taste and evidence, not code.
UIZZE is a remote MCP server aimed at one specific failure mode: the interface a coding agent produces when nobody has shown it what good looks like. Connect it to Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or another MCP client with a bearer token, and the agent gains a catalogue of more than 800,000 real web and iOS screens to search, 35,000 catalogued UI elements, 14,000 design systems, and a set of licensed fonts, icons, and animated interaction systems it can pull in when a named role is missing from the local design language.
The intended loop is inspect, reference, build, review. Before touching a screen the agent inspects the existing components, tokens, and neighbouring views; when a real example would settle a decision it searches the catalogue and keeps only strong matches, stating what each one changes about hierarchy, density, navigation, controls, states, or responsive behaviour; after rendering, it sends the current and baseline screenshots back for a critique covering visible breakage, regressions, privacy exposure, and repeated generic structure. A free preview server exposes just the audit half of that loop — one tool, check_ui_slop, over rendered HTML and CSS, with no authentication required — which makes the paid catalogue the thing you are actually buying at $9 per month or $99 once.
UIZZE is for people whose bottleneck is visual judgement rather than code. If your agent already ships working features and the complaint is that everything it builds looks the same, this addresses exactly that and nothing else.
Starting price: $9/mo · Free tier: yes · Model: freemium
Price history tracked from June 2026
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Free preview | Free | No-auth MCP preview server, no signup · One tool: check_ui_slop over rendered HTML and CSS · Flags generic structure, fake content, inert controls, missing states, default agent palettes · One free screenshot UI Slop Score in the browser, no account |
| Full Access | $9/mo | Authenticated MCP endpoint with a bearer agent token · Search across 800,000+ web and iOS screens · 35,000 UI elements and 14,000 design systems · 15+ premium licensed fonts, web haptics, animated icons · Design contracts, implementation audits, screenshot critique |
| Lifetime | $99 | Same full access, paid once instead of monthly · Breaks even against the monthly plan after 11 months |
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| One of the cheapest paid MCP servers in daily use at $9/month, with a $99 lifetime option that pays for itself in under a year | Narrow by design — it supplies visual evidence and critique, and does nothing for correctness, accessibility implementation, or performance |
| The free preview server needs no account or token, so the core audit can be tested inside an agent before paying anything | Everything runs through MCP, so it is useless outside a coding agent that supports MCP and no standalone editor or plugin exists |
| Bundled fonts, icons, and animations carry stated licence scope and a signed receipt rather than leaving the licensing question to the developer | The catalogue is web and iOS only; Android, desktop, and TV interfaces are not covered |
| Screenshots sent for review are processed transiently and are not added to the catalogue | Very young and thinly documented as a business — the site is the only substantial source, and there is no public pricing history to check the $9 and $99 figures against |
| Referencing real shipped screens invites the obvious copying question, and the site's answer is an editorial stance plus a DMCA page rather than a licence you can inspect |
Visual UI editor that outputs production React and Tailwind CSS deterministically, synced straight into your codebase
AI design tool that turns prompts into interactive prototypes built from your team's real design system
Vercel's generative UI tool — turn a prompt, screenshot, or design into production React, Next.js, and Tailwind code
AI-powered UI design tool that generates multi-screen prototypes from text prompts
AI-powered UI/UX design tool that turns text prompts, screenshots, and sketches into editable wireframes and mockups for non-designers
Full access is $9 per month, or $99 paid once for lifetime access. There is also a free tier: a no-auth MCP preview server exposing the check_ui_slop tool, plus a free browser screenshot score that needs no signup.
It is the recognisable default look coding agents fall into: generic layout structure, placeholder content, controls that do nothing, missing loading and error states, stock agent colour palettes, and copy that could describe any product. UIZZE checks rendered markup for these patterns and returns specific fixes.
It ships setup prompts for Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, and works with any generic HTTP MCP client. The marketing pages also name GitHub Copilot, Antigravity, and Lovable. OAuth is available for clients that require it instead of a bearer token.
Yes. Point your agent at the preview MCP endpoint, which needs no authentication and provides check_ui_slop over rendered HTML and CSS. Separately, the website scores one uploaded screenshot for free without an account.
According to the tool page, an uploaded screenshot is processed transiently for the requested review and is not added to the UIZZE catalogue. The same page states the review checks visible product specificity, and explicitly cannot tell who or what authored a screen.
Purely on arithmetic, $99 once beats $9 per month after 11 months. The judgement call is whether a very young single-vendor MCP server will still be running and maintained past that point, since a lifetime licence is only worth what the vendor stays alive to serve.
No. Your agent still implements the screen using your existing components and design tokens. UIZZE supplies reference screens, design decisions, licensed materials, and a critique of what was rendered — evidence and review, not code generation.